{לח} וַיֹּ֨אמֶר עֵשָׂ֜ו אֶל-אָבִ֗יו הַֽבֲרָכָ֨ה אַחַ֤ת הִֽוא-לְךָ֙ אָבִ֔י בָּֽרֲכֵ֥נִי גַם-אָ֖נִי אָבִ֑י וַיִּשָּׂ֥א עֵשָׂ֛ו קֹל֖וֹ וַיֵּֽבְךְּ: What is the Vowel under theבIn הכרכה?Is there a Dagesh in the ב?The nikkud here is חטף פתחBut some tikkunim have a שוא (נע)It seems that there are different Sheetos hereRRW
Haveracha is a question . הא השאלה
There is no dagesh after “he hashe’ela”
A chataf patach under a letter which is not “geronit” comes to indicate that the Nikud
Is Sheva Na
It should be pronounced as a sheva na, except if you Lein in shitat ish matliach
(Some North Africa translations)
North Africa traditions
(Not “translations”)
Haveracha is a question . הא השאלהThere is no dagesh after “he hashe’ela”>>Makes sense<<A chataf patach under a letter which is not “geronit” comes to indicate that the NikudIs Sheva Na It should be pronounced as a sheva na,>>Makes sense except some Tikkunim / chumshim have a ShevaAny elaboration on the differences in the nikkud RRW
According to Breuer in the introduction to the תנ״ך from both מוסד הרב קוק and חורב, the שוא נע on the non-gutteral letters is inconsistently marked as a חטף. It was up to the individual scribe, and in almost every case at least one of the manuscripts he used had a regular שוא, so he left them as a regular שוא. (The מקראות גדולות הכתר follows the כתר as it exists and attempts to reconstruct many of those חטפים.) The comment of the מנחת שי on בראשית יב:ג roughly translates to: I’ll write them all as a regular שוא and those who pronounce them properly will be blessed.
Zuki